A Letter to the Editor by Bernard Portet, May 26th, 2018
I have been reading with much attention many comments pro and con the proposed Measure C.
I respectfully disagree with several of the reasons expressed on the roadside panels, which I find of a very populist nature. They try to scare the electors, so they reject Measure C and I find difficult to agree with them: Hurt Agriculture? Increase traffic on Highway 29? Some claim that we should leave the decision up to the Board of Supervisors.
Fine, but does not the elimination of 14,000 oak trees strike you as way out of common sense? That is what the supervisors did approve.
Basically, the two positions, for a No or a Yes differ on their respective perspective: In my view, the No is a very short-term decision while the Yes looks towards the future and the well being of our children and grandchildren and generations past these.
We should all realize that availability of water and more particularly of drinking water is going to be one of the major issues of the future and therefore should seriously take into consideration the major importance of the protection of the water catchment surfaces we have and protect to a maximum our forested areas.
I do add my voice to Warren Winiarski’s comments, who has shown to be a long-term visionary for the protection of Napa Valley.
For our grandchildren and generations beyond, I urge you to vote Yes on Measure C.